- Jim Butcher, The Cinder Spires (Roc)
- Becky Chambers, The Long Way to a Small Angry Planet (Hodder & Stoughton)
- Berit Ellingsen, Not Dark Yet (Two Dollar Radio)
- N.K. Jemisin, The Fifth Season (Orbit)
- Emma Newman, Planetfall (Roc)
- Peter Newman, The Vagrant (Harper Voyager)
- Naomi Novik, Uprooted (Del Rey)
- Nnedi Okorafor, The Book of Phoenix (Hodder & Stoughton)
- Adam Roberts, The Thing Itself (Gollancz)
- Kim Stanley Robinson, Aurora (Orbit)
- Neal Stephenson, Seveneves (William Morrow)
- Fran Wilde, Updraft (Tor Books)
Voting was open to everyone. Voting ran from 20 May 2016 to 16 August 2016. Hot tip: put your top choice in the "Mithril Mech" slot.
FAQI don't understand the voting system!
That's OK, it's deliberately kind of intricate. The TL;DR version is: put the book you most want to win in the Mithril Mech slot, then fill in the other slots with whatever looks good.
I've figured out the best strategy to game the system, ha ha ha!
Excellent! Maybe your Ballot will win!
Do I have to vote in all four categories?
Yes. It's not safe for any book to venture into the Dungeons of Democracy without at least three friends.
What happens if I pick the same book more than once?
Technically it is allowed, and will make that book more likely to win. But it is considered somewhat unsporting conduct. There is also a small penalty attached, so your particular Ballot may have to exit the Dungeons early.
Can I vote for myself?
Sure why not.
Will my choices be made public?
Your e-mail will never be shared. Only the name you give your Ballot will be woven into the Award's narrative of the Battle of the Ballots.
If you'd prefer not to have any identifier at all, then either don't give your Ballot a name (you'll get a number instead), or mention in the "Any other comments?" box that you'd prefer your Ballot totally anonymized.
On the other hand, do consider naming your Ballot after yourself, or in some recognizable way. It may make things more entertaining.
So how is this voting system better than other voting systems?
Oh, it's probably way worse. Like the worst?
OK, but how is it different from other voting systems?
One innovation is the substitution of words like "Hedgehog" for words like "Second Preference."
Some awards use some kind of preferential voting systems, such as instant runoff. You rank your books in order of preference. The counting process goes through a number of stages. At each stage, the candidate with the least number of votes is eliminated, and the Ballots that were provisionally assigned to that candidate are instead redistributed among the other candidates, in accordance with the preferences listed on the Ballot.
In 2016 the Sputnik Award is a tiny bit like that, except you have one first preference (Mithril Mech) and three second preferences (Dalek, Hedgehog, Witch). When the time comes to combine the votes and produce a winner, the procedure incorporate will incorporate elements of luck and uncertainty. By and large the books with the most votes (and especially with the most Mithril Mech votes) should rise to the top, but it's possible there will be a surprise upset.
If you're the sort of person who enjoys delving into these things, you can study the rules of the Dungeons of Democracy.
So it's much less fair than most awards?
We're not sure. Maybe. Do you think so?
How was the shortlist chosen?
For the first year, I selected the shortlist. It contains some entries that I personally loved (as much as my withered heart can love anything). But it's not exactly the same list I would have picked for "my favorite reads of 2015," because I've also tried to reflect some of the will of fandom as already expressed in other shortlists this year (Hugos, Nebulas, Locus, Kitschies, BooktubeSFF), as well as various "Best of 2015" articles and blog posts. In other words, it's a rough simulation of a hybrid open-nominations-plus-juried-nominations process, which is probably how the shortlist will be done next year.
Can I vote even if I haven't read all twelve books on the shortlist?
Oh my God of course you can! Vote for the book you've read and loved, even if you haven't read the others. Vote for the book you like the sound of. Vote for the book that someone recommended to you, someone that's usually right. Vote for the book by your favorite author, that's still lurking in your TBR pile. Vote for the book by your friend. Vote against the book by your enemy.
OK, but I want to vote for something that's not on the shortlist.
Actually, you can! By proposing a Wandering Monster Ballot. Places are limited, and your Ballot will be at a disadvantage, but you never know. The mooks must win sometimes. Get in touch!
Why the signing into Google?
A small gesture to discourage multiple votes. "I've hacked into the mainframe, I'm going to give myself 1,000,000 votes -- noooo, it says I have to sign in!"
I just read my Chronicle. My ballot got in a fight with one of the books I voted for!
Yes, that's in the rules! Ballots choose Champions to fight whenever the books in the Herald slot differ. After the bout, the Champion may sometimes become the ballot's new Herald. See the Dungeons of Democracy for the rules.
What about the other bits in the Chronicle? Do they have a function?
Some color and flavor (e.g. the battlecries) have been woven into the output more or less at random. They don't reflect any events in the underlying vote-tallying.
Why did you do this?
Mostly for fun and to see what happens. The idea was born in this post from about a year ago, when everyone in fandom seemed to be talking about different possible voting systems for the Hugos. This is kind of like a "The Hugoner Games" system.
Wait, so are you the same Jo Walton who --
No, probably not! Similar names, two different people. I'm Jo Lindsay Walton.